Salary increment request letter
Nine versions plus a talking-points sheet for the meeting — and the ask priced after tax, so you walk in knowing the monthly rupee figure you are actually negotiating for.
Salary increment request builder
Nine situations, plus a talking-points sheet for the meeting. State a figure, give the evidence, ask for a conversation.
Your own manager, not HR. HR processes a decision; your manager makes the case for it.
A figure, not a range and not a percentage. A manager cannot take a feeling to a compensation committee.
Outcomes with numbers in them, not responsibilities. One line each, and three is plenty.
A range you can point at, from job postings or a published survey. Hearsay about a colleague's pay is worse than nothing.
State a number. The commonest reason these requests go nowhere is that they ask to “discuss compensation”, which gives a manager nothing to take to anyone. And do not mention leaving unless you genuinely have an offer — there is a version below that handles that case properly.
Your draft
0 of 8 details filled[Date]
Subject: Compensation review — [Your full name], [Your designation]
Dear [Manager's name],
As the appraisal cycle is underway, I wanted to set out my case in writing so that it is available when compensation is being decided rather than afterwards.
Over the past [years] years in this role I have:
[what you delivered]
On that basis I would like to request that my annual cost to company be revised from [current CTC] to [requested CTC].
I would be grateful for half an hour to discuss this, at whatever point in the cycle is most useful. If any of this is better supported with further detail, tell me what would help and I will put it together.
Thank you,
[Your full name]
[Your designation]
Free, no signup, no email needed. Everything you type stays in this browser — the document is built on your device and nothing is sent to us.
Key takeaways
- →State a figure. Asking to “discuss compensation” gives your manager nothing to take to anybody, and it is the commonest reason these requests go nowhere.
- →A raise is worth much less in hand than on paper: a 10% raise on ₹12,00,000 is about ₹9,808 a month, not ₹10,000.
- →Evidence means outcomes with numbers in them. Three is plenty; six general ones land worse than three specific ones.
- →Ask before the compensation decision is made, which is weeks before you are told the number.
- →Most managers cannot approve a revision alone — they decide whether to argue for it. So the case has to be portable and short.
- →Do not mention leaving unless you have an offer. If you do, there is one version written for it and it is deliberately the only one.
- →If refused, convert the no into a condition and a date, in writing. “Let's revisit later” with no date is a decline with better manners.
Price the ask before you make it
Every other page about increment letters helps you phrase the request. None of them tells you what it is worth. That matters more than the wording, for two reasons: a percentage is not a thing you can spend, and the share of a raise that survives tax is not what most people assume.
On a ₹12,00,000 CTC with a conventional structure. The upper bar in each pair is the increase in CTC; the lower one is the part that survives provident fund and income tax.
- Increase in CTC
- What reaches your account
The takeaway: the share you keep does not fall smoothly, and the shape is worth understanding before you pick a number. At this CTC a small raise is almost entirely yours — 98 per cent of a 5 per cent increase survives, because taxable income is still inside the section 87A rebate and the only leakage is provident fund. Push past the rebate threshold and the share collapses: a 20 per cent raise keeps only 65 per cent, because crossing the threshold costs the whole rebate as well as taxing the increase. Ask for more again and the share recovers to 74 per cent, since the rebate is already gone and only the marginal rate applies.
The practical consequence is blunt: there is a band just above the rebate threshold where a raise is worth unusually little in hand, and a slightly larger ask is worth disproportionately more. So work out the monthly figure before the meeting — ₹9,808a month is a concrete thing to negotiate for, and “10 per cent” is not. Run it on your own salary — the band sits at a different place for every starting salary.
View the figures as a table
| Raise | New CTC | Increase in CTC | Net gain a year | Net gain a month | Share kept |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +5% | ₹12,60,000 | ₹60,000 | ₹58,846 | ₹4,904 | 98% |
| +10% | ₹13,20,000 | ₹1,20,000 | ₹1,17,692 | ₹9,808 | 98% |
| +15% | ₹13,80,000 | ₹1,80,000 | ₹1,32,378 | ₹11,032 | 74% |
| +20% | ₹14,40,000 | ₹2,40,000 | ₹1,57,181 | ₹13,098 | 65% |
| +30% | ₹15,60,000 | ₹3,60,000 | ₹2,56,513 | ₹21,376 | 71% |
| +40% | ₹16,80,000 | ₹4,80,000 | ₹3,55,845 | ₹29,654 | 74% |
Which version you need
| Your situation | Use | What carries it |
|---|---|---|
| The appraisal cycle is underway | At the annual appraisal | Timing. Sent before the number is decided, not after it lands. |
| It is mid-year and waiting is not reasonable | Out of cycle | Acknowledging the timing rather than ignoring it, and asking for the realistic path if not the revision. |
| You took on work that used to be someone else's | Added scope | A fact rather than a judgement. The strongest case there is. |
| You have outgrown the role, not just the salary | Promotion request | Evidence that you are already operating at the next level, and asking for the specific gaps if not. |
| You are simply paid below market | Below market | A benchmark you can point at. Without one, argue the delivery instead. |
| You have another offer in hand | Counter-offer | A fact stated plainly, with a real deadline. The only version that mentions leaving. |
| You are being confirmed after probation | On confirmation | That confirmation and compensation are usually decided together. |
| You already asked and were turned down | After a rejection | Converting the no into a condition and a date. The most useful letter in the set. |
| You have the meeting and need to prepare | Talking points — not a letter | A one-page brief for your own use, including what not to say. |
The takeaway: the last two are the ones people never think to ask for and most need. The letter gets you the room; the talking-points sheet is what you need in it, and the after-rejection version is what turns a dead end into a date.
What gets granted, and on what basis
These are observed market conventions rather than entitlements — nothing in Indian law requires an employer to grant an increment at all. They are here as a yardstick for whether your ask is in the range that gets approved by a manager or the range that needs an exception.
| Basis | Typical range | Who approves it | What it needs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard annual increment | Single digits | Decided in the cycle, within an allocated budget. | Nothing beyond meeting expectations. |
| Top performance band | Low double digits | Still inside the cycle, but a larger share of the pool. | A rating, and usually a manager who argued for it. |
| Documented change in scope | Double digits | Often a level above the manager. | The scope change recorded with dates, and the outcomes it produced. |
| Promotion | A step to the next level's band | A separate approval from the increment. | Evidence of already operating at the next level. |
| Market correction | Varies widely | HR, usually against a benchmarking exercise. | A benchmark you can point at, not hearsay. |
| Retention raise after an offer | The largest of these | Escalated, and fast. | A real offer. It is granted against leverage rather than a case, which is why it costs something. |
The takeaway: the column that decides your approach is the third one. If what you are asking for needs a level above your manager, your case has to survive being repeated by someone who was not in the room — which is an argument for three numerical lines rather than a page of context.
Timing against the appraisal cycle
| When | What is happening internally | What to do |
|---|---|---|
| Early in the cycle, before ratings | Budgets are being allocated and managers are building cases. | The best moment. Put your case in writing so it is available when the decision is made. |
| After ratings, before the letter | Numbers are largely set but not communicated. | Still worth asking, but expect the answer to be about next cycle. |
| After the increment letter arrives | The budget is spent. | Asking now mostly produces a no. Use the after-rejection version to set a condition and a date instead. |
| Mid-year, out of cycle | No pool exists, so anything granted is an exception. | Use the out-of-cycle version, acknowledge the timing, and expect a level above your manager to be involved. |
| Immediately after taking on new scope | The change is fresh and undisputed. | The single best moment outside the cycle. Ask while whose work it was is still obvious. |
| With an offer in hand | The calculus changes entirely. | Use the counter-offer version, set a real deadline, and treat the answer as final. |
The takeaway: two moments are worth far more than the others: early in the cycle, and the week after your scope changed. Both are easy to miss and neither comes back.
When changing jobs pays more than any raise
This is the comparison worth running before you ask, not after you are refused — because it tells you what your alternative is actually worth, which is the only thing that makes a number feel defensible when you say it out loud.
From a ₹12,00,000 CTC, with 8% increments in both cases afterwards, on net pay rather than CTC. The point is not the first year — it is that every later increment is computed on the higher base.
The takeaway: in the first year the move is worth ₹1,62,359 more in hand. Over five years the cumulative gap is ₹11,84,666, because the higher base compounds through every later increment. That is the honest arithmetic — and it is also why the internal raise has to be argued for properly rather than hoped for.
What this chart cannot price
- ·A notice period served, or bought out, before the new salary starts.
- ·The gratuity clock restarting — worth most if you are close to five years.
- ·Unvested variable pay or a retention bonus forfeited by leaving.
- ·A joining bonus clawback at the new employer if the move does not work out.
- ·The risk that the new role is worse than the current one, which no model prices.
The first two are quantifiable and worth quantifying before you decide. Cost the notice period and check what the gratuity clock is worth.
View the figures as a table
| Year | Stayed | Changed jobs | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ₹11,96,677 | ₹13,59,036 | ₹1,62,359 |
| 2 | ₹12,34,129 | ₹14,62,342 | ₹2,28,212 |
| 3 | ₹13,19,017 | ₹15,70,085 | ₹2,51,068 |
| 4 | ₹14,19,121 | ₹16,83,157 | ₹2,64,036 |
| 5 | ₹15,26,283 | ₹18,05,274 | ₹2,78,991 |
| Cumulative | ₹11,84,666 |
How to build the case with numbers
The difference between a request that moves and one that does not is almost never the tone. It is whether the case is portable — short enough, numerical enough and specific enough that your manager can repeat it accurately to somebody who was not in the room.
That means outcomes rather than responsibilities. “Led the migration that cut month-end close from nine days to four” survives being repeated. “Responsible for the month-end close process” is a job description, and a job description is an argument for your current salary rather than a higher one.
Say this
- ·A figure, said early and out loud.
- ·Three outcomes with numbers in them.
- ·The date you took on work that was someone else's, and whose it was.
- ·A benchmark range from postings or a published survey.
- ·A request for a short meeting and a timeframe.
Never this
- ·A range. It gets settled at the bottom of it.
- ·A colleague's salary, even if you know it accurately.
- ·A personal need. It is not a reason your manager can use upwards.
- ·A hint that you are looking, with no offer behind it.
- ·Six achievements. It dilutes rather than strengthens.
Two asks, priced
Both from a ₹12,00,000 CTC on a conventional structure. Every figure is produced by the builder above rather than typed, so the page and the tool cannot disagree.
| A 10% ask | A 25% ask | |
|---|---|---|
| New CTC | ₹13,20,000 | ₹15,00,000 |
| Increase in CTC | ₹1,20,000 | ₹3,00,000 |
| Extra in hand, per year | ₹1,17,692 | ₹2,06,847 |
| Extra in hand, per month | ₹9,808 | ₹17,237 |
| Share of the increase you keep | 98% | 69% |
The takeaway: the 25 per cent ask is two and a half times the 10 per cent one on paper, and delivers about 1.8 times as much in hand — because the section 87A rebate is lost on the way and more of the increase is taxed. Neither figure is a reason not to ask. Both are reasons to know the monthly number before you do.
What to do after a rejection
Most people treat a no as the end of the conversation, and it is the point at which the conversation becomes most useful. A refusal contains information if you ask for it, and three questions convert it into something you can act on.
What specifically would need to be true for the answer to be yes? A condition is workable; “the timing is not right” is not. When is the next realistic opportunity? A date you can hold somebody to beats an open question. Is there anything other than cost to company that can move? Title, scope, a one-off payment and a training budget all come from different pools, and sometimes one of them is available when the salary pool is not.
Ask all three in writing. The after-rejection version in the builder does exactly that, and it deliberately opens by saying you are not re-opening the decision — because a manager who feels re-litigated stops helping, and a manager handed a condition to set usually sets one.
Frequently asked questions
How do I write a salary increment request letter?
How much of a raise actually reaches my bank account?
What is a reasonable salary increment to ask for in India?
When is the best time to ask for a raise?
What should I document before asking?
Should I mention that I might leave?
What can my manager actually approve?
What do I do if my raise request is rejected?
Is a counter-offer a good idea?
Does changing jobs pay more than any raise?
Should I ask for a promotion or a raise?
What is the difference between an increment, a promotion and a retention raise?
How long should I wait before asking again after a raise?
Can my employer reduce my salary instead?
Next
What to do next
- 1
Work out the monthly after-tax figure for your ask
That is the number you are negotiating for. A percentage is not a thing you can spend, and the share you keep is not what most people assume.
Open the in-hand salary calculator - 2
Cost your alternative before you ask, not after you are refused
Knowing what a move is worth is what makes a number feel defensible when you say it out loud — and the notice period and gratuity clock are both quantifiable.
Cost the notice period - 3
Print the talking-points sheet and take it in
The failure mode of a salary conversation is not a badly worded email. It is going into the room without the numbers.
Related tools
Sources for the figures on this page
Assessment year for which the slab rates, rebate, surcharge and cess in this file were published by the Income Tax Department
Income Tax Department e-filing portal, tax slabs help page for salaried individuals for AY 2026-27, giving both the old regime and the default regime under s.115BAC, the surcharge thresholds and the 4% health and education cess. The Department had not published AY 2027-28 rates at the date checked.
View sourceChecked 2026-10-14
Maximum s.87A rebate under the default (new) regime
Income Tax Department e-filing portal, AY 2026-27: rebate of up to Rs 60,000 where total income does not exceed Rs 12,00,000 under the default regime.
View sourceChecked 2026-10-14
EPF wage ceiling for mandatory coverage and for monthly contributions, per month
Gazette Notification dated 17 September 2026, reported by PIB, Ministry of Labour & Employment (Release ID 2314111, 23 September 2026): the wage ceiling "which was last enhanced to Rs 15,000 per month in September 2014, has now been revised to Rs 25,000 per month", and "the wage ceiling for monthly contributions shall be enhanced to Rs 25,000 per month or the actual salary/wages, whichever is lower". Employees not enrolled solely because their wages exceeded Rs 15,000 become eligible where monthly wages do not exceed Rs 25,000. The ceiling is a notified amount: Code on Social Security 2020, s.2(89).
View sourceChecked 2026-10-14
Is there a central statutory rule that notice-pay recovery must be computed on basic pay (or on gross)?
No. No provision of the Code on Wages 2019, the Code on Social Security 2020 or the Industrial Relations Code 2020 prescribes the salary base or the divisor for recovering pay for an unserved notice period from a departing employee. Notice period and any recovery for not serving it are creatures of the contract of employment, read with the employer's policy and, where they apply, certified or model standing orders. Anyone stating that basic pay is the national default is stating a market convention, not a rule. The correct first step is to read the clause and ask the employer to identify the basis it has applied.
View sourceChecked 2026-09-01
What changed
14 October 2026 — first published. Every after-tax figure on this page comes from the same engine as the in-hand salary calculator, computed on the slab rates, standard deduction, section 87A rebate, surcharge and cess the Income Tax Department publishes for AY 2026-27, and on the EPF wage ceiling of ₹25,000 a month as raised on 17 September 2026. The increment ranges and approval levels in the tables are observed market conventions, not entitlements, and the page says so — nothing in Indian law requires an employer to grant an increment.
Written and reviewed by Deepak Middha, Chartered Accountant (ICAI, India) and founder of LayoffNext.

Founder of LayoffNext. Chartered Accountant and finance educator who builds free tools for people navigating layoffs.